Ayodhaya Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55051 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2017 Thana -KOCHAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Ayodhaya Singh S/o Ramdeo Singh Resident of Village- Shohwaliya Khurd, P.S. Kochas (Parshathua), District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kochas (Parshathua) P.S. Case No. 120/2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, section 302 was added.

Earlier, prayer for regular bail of petitioner was rejected vide order dated 15.01.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59142/2017 with observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after remaining in custody for one year. Petitioner is in custody since 06.09.2017.

Allegation against petitioner is of giving one Rami blow over head of father of informant who became injured and died after ten days in Hospital during treatment.

Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55051 of 2018 (2) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 since 06.09.2017.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge VII, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kochas (Parshathua) P.S. Case No. 120/2017, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T