← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79872/2024bail granted

Sonu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-13Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79872 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2024 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Sonu Paswan Son of Lambu Paswan @ Lambu Resident of Village -Baherwaghachi , Police Station- Nayagawn District -Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 294 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, police, on the basis of secret information that some miscreants were planning to commit dacoity, raided the place of occurrence and apprehended accused persons including this petitioner. It is further alleged that one mobile phone was recovered from this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminatin article has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79872 of 2024(2) dt.13-11-2024 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and ammunitions rather the arms and ammunitions have been recovered from the co-accused persons. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2024 and has two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 294 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T