Binod Nut @ Binod Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78797 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2024 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Binod Nut @ Binod Ram Son of Bhandola Nut Resident of Village - Salkhuwa, P.S. - Amnour, District - Saran at Chapra 2.

Kunkun Ram Nut @ Kunkun Ram @ Kun Kun Nut Son of Kishori Nut Resident of Village - Salkhuwa, P.S. - Amnour, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary. 2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Baniapur P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366A & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

As per prosecution, case, co-accused persons, including the petitioners fled away with the daughter of the informant, aged about 16 years. It is also alleged that when the informant went to the house of co-accused, then they refused to return the daughter of the informant and abused the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78797 of 2024(3) dt.28-01-2025 2/3 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 23-06-2024. Petitioners bear no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioners' counsel that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation attributed to the petitioners, rather allegation is general and omnibus. Specific allegation is against one Saroj Ram Nut, who was in love affair with the daughter of the informant and they have solemnized marriage. Petitioners are relatives of the Saroj Ram Nut. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. Witnesses have supported the prosecution case, which fact finds mention at paragraph Nos. 6, 7 & 8 of the case diary.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioners, there being no specific allegation against the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 8.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78797 of 2024(3) dt.28-01-2025 3/3 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baniapur P.S. Case No. 200 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T