Tabrez Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79352 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2024 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Tabrez Ansari Son of Saifullah Ansari Resident of village -Mirpur PS -Goh, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Goh P.S.Case No. 65 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case is that all the FIR named co-accused persons being variously armed with lathi, sword and knife came at the door of the informant started abusing, assaulting and also threatened the informant to withdraw the case. It is further alleged that accused petitioner assaulted the wife of the informant causing injury by sharp cutting weapon. Further allegation is that they assaulted the informant with knife, lathi and fists when he came for rescue.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79352 of 2024(3) dt.21-04-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of the informant made in the FIR cannot be sustained as the same does not stand corroborated by injury report, which has been annexed as Annexure-P-2, indicating that the wife of the informant had received a lacerated wound on the right side of nose caused by hard and blunt portion by sharp cutting weapon. The final injury report is also on the record would also go to show that the said injuries are simple in nature.
6. Learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail on the ground that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent on which the learned counsel for the petitioner responds that the case is one under section 498A in which he is on bail.
7. Taking into consideration all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of four weeks from today the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in Goh P.S.Case No. 65 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79352 of 2024(3) dt.21-04-2025 3/3 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and subject to the further condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in investigation/ trial. (Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T