Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80333 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2022 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar S/O Satyendra Prasad @ Satyendra Yadav R/O Village- Birbal Bigha, P.S- Belaganj, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rabia Gulnaz For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. 15 litres of country made liquor, 1000 liters of Jawa Mahua and other materials were recovered from the place of occurrence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the local Choukidar disclosed the name of the petitioner. He submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has four criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80333 of 2024(2) dt.20-12-2024 2/2 since 19.09.2024.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 90 of 2022.
7. However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T