Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57939/2018bail granted

Suraj Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-28Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57939 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2018 Thana -CHOUTARWA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Suraj Kumar son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad.

2. Lajeem Ansari son of Md. Raju Mian @ Raju Ansari, Both are resident of Village- Prakash Nagar, Narkatiaganj, Police Station- Shikarpur, DistrictWest Champaran. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No. 107 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 12 litres of kacha spirit from the dickey of motorcycle of the petitioners.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and petitioner no. 1 has no criminal antecedent and the petitioner is an accused in one more case but not in the similar case as the present one. They have been in judicial custody since 26.05.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57939 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Special Judge, Excise, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No. 107 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T