Shekh Azazuk @ Sk. Azazuk @ Azauk v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16987 of 2024 ====================================================== Shekh Azazuk @ Sk. Azazuk @ Azauk S/o Shekh Mahamud, Resident of Village-Danial Parsauna, P.S.-Sathi, Dist.-West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Secretary General, Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 6.
The Additional Chief Secetary, Local Ara Engineering Organization, Department of Planning and Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 7.
The Chief Engineer, Local Area Enginering Organization, Department of Planning and Development, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 8.
The Collector cum District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 9.
The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran. 10.
The Circle Officer, Lauriya Block, Lauriya, District-West Champaran. 11.
The Block Panchayati Raj Officer cum Executive Officer, Lauriya Block, Lauriya, District-West Champaran.
12.
The Executive Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Works Division, Bettiah, West Champaran.
13.
The Assistant Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Works Division, Bettiah, West Champaran.
14.
The Junior Engineer, Local Area Engineering Organization, Works Division, Bettiah, West Champaran.
15.
The Additional Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran. 16.
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Bettiah, West Champaran. 17.
The Block Development Officer, Lauriya Block, Lauriya, Dist-West Champaran.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.
For the State :
Mr.Prashant Pratap, G.P. 2 Mr. Ajit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.16987 of 2024(2) dt.12-11-2024 2/2 12-11-2024 Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per departmental circular dated 30-08-2022, the Gram Panchayat Bhawan is generally to be constructed in the village headquarter of Panchayat, but in spite of availability of plot at village headquarter, the Panchayat Bhawan is proposed to be constructed in another village. The representation of the petitioner, as per submission of the learned counsel, is pending before Respondent Nos. 16 and 17.
3. Under the said circumstances, respondent Nos. 16 and 17 are directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible.
4. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U