Jawayar Mian @ Jabbar Mian @ Jabbayar Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56714 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -341 Year- 2018 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== JAWAYAR MIAN @ JABBAR MIAN @ JABBAYAR MIAN S/o Isarayal Mian, R/o Vill.- Ratanpur, P.S.- Banjaria, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 341/2018 G.R. No. 3904/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against three accused including the petitioner is committing theft in the house of informant, but two accused were apprehended and one person succeeded in fleeing away. It has been submitted that nothing has been recovered from possession of petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in the case.

Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 19.06.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56714 of 2018 (2) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 341/2018, G.R. No. 3904/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T