Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78835/2023allowed

Nandani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-31Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78835 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2023 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Nandani Kumari W/O Subhodh Kumar R/O Shyam Nagar Dhabauli, P.SBegusarai, Muffasil (Lakho O.P), Distt.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)a, (1a), (1b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per FIR, the petitioner along with other coaccused were apprehended on spot because they were indulged in preparation of illegal arms. During search, semi prepared barrels, drilling pin, hammer, iron rod and other articles were recovered.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. She has committed no offence. The petitioner has neither any concern

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78835 of 2023(3) dt.31-01-2024 2/2 with the alleged recovery nor the place of occurrence belongs to her. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submitted that the other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 24.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1575 of 2024. She is languishing in judicial custody since 26.08.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner being a lady as well as the period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 500 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T