Anupam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76242 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Anupam Kumar son of Ashok Prasad @ Ashok Kumar Resident Of VillageJalalpur, Ps- Warisaliganj, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Prasad Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kr. Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 374 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 111(4), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66-B and 66-D of the I.T. Act.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 18.07.2025.
4. The allegation against the petitioner is to commit cyber fraud and also to cheat innocent persons along with other co-accused persons, where upon police raid mobile phone, ATM Cards and sim cards etc., was recovered by police. Petitioner was apprehended on spot with his mobile phone.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that mobile in issue, which was recovered from the possession of this petitioner belongs to him and nothing incriminating appears or was collected from the seized mobile
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76242 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 mobile phone during the course of investigation, which may suggest prima-facie involvement of petitioner in the present crime in question. While concluding the argument it is submitted that, petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case has already completed, and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as prima-facie nothing incriminating surfaced out of seized mobile phone suggesting involvement of petitioner with crime in question, coupled with the fact as petitioner remains in custody since 18.07.2025, accordingly above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 374 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Nawada/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) S.Tripathi/- U T