Sachin Raut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75456 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2024 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sachin Raut Son of Late Swyamber Raut, Resident of Village - Bakhari, Ward No. 01, Police Station - Bairgania, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mrs. Divya Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 214 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 234 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75456 of 2025(2) dt.04-11-2025 2/2 with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not arrested on spot. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of secret information. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025 and has got four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 214 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T