← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73086/2019bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjeet Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-10Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73086 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR SAH @ RANJEET SAH S/o Surendra Sah @ Surendra Prasad Sad R/o village- Gamharia Itahra, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arbind Kumar Pandey (App 84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 10-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner who is in custody since 19.9.2019 has filed the instant application for grant of bail in connection with Special(Excise) Case No. 280 of 2019(District-Saharsa) registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the allegation in the FIR, 557 litres of country liquor is said to have been recovered from the Scorpio vehicle belonging to one Md. Nurullah. It is further stated that the maternal grant father of the petitioner stated that the said vehicle had been parked by the grand son Sanjeet Sah. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73086 of 2019(3) dt.10-12-2019 2/2 that even from the allegation in the F.I.R. the alleged recovery is from the Scorpio vehicle which was parked by the full brother of this petitioner namely Sanjeet Sah. The petitioner has no concern with the said vehicle or the seized liquor. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner who is in custody since 19.9.2019 and has no criminal antecedent.

The application for bail was opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Saharsa in connection with Special(Excise) Case No. 280 of 2019(District- Saharsa). (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U T