Vinay Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74865 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== Vinay Thakur S/o Shyam Lal Thakur R/O Village- Baruna, P.O. and P.S.- Buxar (I), District- Buxar, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
Anurudh Chauhan S/O Sudama Chauhan R/O Village- Baruna, P.O. and P.S.- Buxar (I), District- Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rudrank Shivam Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1) and 89 of the BNS and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
3. The victim is a minor girl of 15 years of age. She went for tuition on 08.07.2025 but didn't return. When she returned, she narrated the occurrence to her family members. She stated that the petitioner, who is a teacher, was continuously committing sexual assaults for 3-4 months and she became pregnant. He brought her to Buxar on 08.07.2025 and at the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74865 of 2025(3) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 instance of the petitioner, the pregnancy was terminated.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The petitioner is a teacher and for some ulterior motive, he has falsely been implicated in this case. He is a person of clean antecedent and is under custody since 13.07.2025.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the victim, in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, has fully corroborated the occurrence and she became pregnant after sexual assaults by the petitioner, who is a teacher.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, in my view, the petitioner doesn't deserve the privileges for bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T