Baij Kumar @ Baiju Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80298 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2023 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Baij Kumar @ Baiju Kumar Singh Son Of Ramjee Yadav R/O VillagePiprahiya, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, Dist.- Bhojpur 2.
Ram Pravesh Yadav @ Ram Pravesh Singh Sonof Late Jai Ram Yadav @ Jai Ram Singh R/O Village- Piprahiya, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, Dist.- Bhojpur 3.
Nand Kumar Singh @ Nand Kumar Son Of Late Jai Ram Yadav @ Jai Ram Singh R/O Village- Piprahiya, P.S.- Ara Muffasil, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307, 337, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the informant by means of bricks.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that the injuries found upon the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80298 of 2023(2) dt.18-12-2023 2/2 victim are simple in nature which is clear from the impugned order itself. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegations levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the injuries found upon the victim are simple in nature, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Ara Muffasil P.S. Case No.339 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T