Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60374/2018bail granted

Lal Mohammad v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60374 of 2018 (2) dt.06-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.60374 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Lal Mohammad S/o Md. Mazid , R/o Vill.- Gajpati, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhubneshwar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Samastipur Excise Case No. 231 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 99.405 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 04.08.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.60374 of 2018 (2) dt.06-10-2018 Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned VIth Additional Sessions Judge - cum Special Judge, Excise Act, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur Excise Case No. 231 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T