Raghunandan Singh @ Lallu Singh @ Lallu Yadav @ Lally Yadav @ Raghunandan Sing v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.112 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2022 Thana- CHANDI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Raghunandan Singh @ Lallu Singh @ Lallu Yadav @ Lally Yadav @ Raghunandan Sing Son Of Sri Shyam Bihari Singh Resident Of Village - Jokata, P.S.- Chandi, District - Bhojpur At Ara ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
The prosecution case, in brief, is that after getting secret information, the informant along with police personnel reached at Akhgaon Rampur Road near Power House and apprehended this petitioner. Upon search, one country made pistol along with two live cartridges was recovered from possession of the petitioner. Accordingly, the seizure list has been prepared in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.112 of 2023(2) dt.27-03-2023 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged arms which was seized by the police. It is further submitted that there is no any independent witnesses of seizure list which is completely violation of section 100 of Cr.P.C. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 28.6.2022.
Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 165 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-V, Ara/ concerned Court.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T