Purnvashi Yadav @ Amawash v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57983 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2018 Thana -PIRO District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Purnvashi Yadav @ Amawash S/o Dhiraj Singh @ Dhiroa Singh, R/o Vill.- Kaulo Dehari, P.S.- Chauri, District- Bhojpur at Ara. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 64 OF 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25 (1-b) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. As per F.I.R., the allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol and mobile from the possession of the petitioner and it further appears that the petitioner is accused in three other cases.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. So far the criminal antecedent against the petitioner is concerned, he is accused in more than three other cases and he is in custody since
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57983 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 01.03.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur in connection with Piro P.S.Case No. 64 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T