Lalti Devi @ Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80068 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2023 Thana- EKMA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Lalti Devi @ Lalita Devi Wife Of Lalu Mahto Resident Of VillageGangawa P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran At Chapra 2.

Subi Devi @ Suggi Devi Wife Of Rabindra Mahto Resident Of VillageGangawa P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran At Chapra 3.

Anshu Devi Wife Of Durgesh Mahto @ Durga Mahto Resident Of VillageGangawa P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 302, 307, 504, 506, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioners along with others is of brutally assaulted the informant's family members. It is further alleged that due to assault the informant's uncle and his father succumbed to injury.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. They have committed no offence. The petitioners and informant are co-sharer and due to land dispute and demand

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80068 of 2023(2) dt.13-12-2023 2/2 of share in property this occurrence was occurred. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no specific overt act of assaulting against them. He submitted that the petitioners were only abusing at the time of occurrence. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. They are languishing in judicial custody since 12.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners being a lady as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st Saran at Chapra in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 219 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T