Rahul Raj @ Sinkesh Kumar @ Sinkesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76739 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2025 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Rahul Raj @ Sinkesh Kumar @ Sinkesh Yadav S/O Sri Ram Parvesh Yadav @ Ram Parvesh Rai R/o East Laxmi Nagar, Khemnichak, P.S.- Ram Krishna Nagar, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishwanath Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner assaulted her husband by an iron rod causing injury on head, further Rinkesh is alleged to have assaulted her husband by an iron rod causing injury on head and Amirak Rai is alleged to have assaulted by lathi causing injury on chest.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from side of the petitioner, Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No.228/2025 was instituted against the informant and his side and the instant FIR has been instituted in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76739 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 order to coerce the side of the petitioner into submission. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then assault was not on vital part of the body and petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No.491/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T