Shailesh Kumar @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75320 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Shailesh Kumar @ Sonu S/O Ram Bhajan Prasad R/o Vill- Bhavani Bigha, P.S.- Warisaliganj, Dist.-Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudish Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025 Heard Mr. Sudish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 111, 317(5) & 61(2)of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had information through the Pratibimb app that on Instagram, an advertisement regarding an online loan was being given by the holder of mobile no. 9531686593. At the tower location of this mobile, a raid was made. The petitioner was apprehended. It is further alleged that from the house of this petitioner, two mobiles were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75320 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the alleged number from which the advertisement of online loan was given on Instagram, does not belong to the petitioner and only mobile was recovered from his possession. No incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is not connected in any way with the said offence. It has also been submitted that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 04.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 123 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T