Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63011/2018bail granted

Dukho Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63011 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63011 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictARRARIA ======================================================

1. Dukho Devi Wife of Shanichar Mandal Resident of Village- Bhattabari Ward no.-13,m Dhanpura P.S. Forbesganj District-Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Excise Case No. 36 of 2018 corresponding to Special Case No. 984 of 2018, registered for offences punishable Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 24.9 litres of liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and she has been in judicial custody since 23.08.2018 and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on her for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63011 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 02nd Additional Sessions Judge - cum - Special Judge, Araria in connection with Excise Case No. 36 of 2018 corresponding to Special Case No. 984 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T