Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Lal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66289 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-779 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Lal, Son of Baleshwar Mahto, Resident of Village- Kanap, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a)(d) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 1410 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the goat farm belonging to joint family of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66289 of 2018(2) dt.12-12-2018 2/2 substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 1410 liters wine is recovered from the goat farm belonging to joint family of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -VII-cum- Special Judge, Excise, Aurangabad in connection with Excise Case No. 779 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T