← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78294/2023dismissed

Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-11Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78294 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2023 Thana- GHOGHARDIHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== SANJAY YADAV @ SANJAY KUMAR YADAV Son of Rajendra Prasad Yadav R/o vill - Kiratpur, P.s. - Ghoghardiha, distt. - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandra Mohan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-12-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.77 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354B, 379, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted on the head of the informant due to which he got injured.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He fairly

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78294 of 2023(2) dt.11-12-2023 2/2 submitted that the injury of the informant has been found grievous in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T