Vikky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62962 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2018 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna ====================================================== Vikky Kumar, Son of Mukesh Prasad, Resident of Village- Wazirganj, P.S.- Gaya, District- Gaya, at present residing at Punaichak, Kasturba Path, House of Halchal Rai, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Shri Krishnapuri P.S. Case No. 152 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one stolen mobile.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 19.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62962 of 2018(2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Shri Krishnapuri P.S. Case No. 152 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U