Ramnarayan Rai @ Ram Narayan Roy v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80628 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2010 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ramnarayan Rai @ Ram Narayan Roy Son of Lakshman Rai @ Late Lakshuman Ray Resident of village - Akodhi Chandrabhan Patti, P.S.- Karagahar (O.P.- Badahari), District - Rohtas, Sasaram, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karagahar P.S. Case No. 184 of 2010 instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Accusation against the accused persons including the petitioner is of commission of murder of the deceased.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that, police after investigation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80628 of 2024(3) dt.18-02-2025 2/2 submitted final form against the petitioner and one Dinesh Rai, however, learned court below differing with the same took cognizance against the petitioner and one Dinesh Rai. The coaccused person has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.01.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 45036 of 2011. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 02.07.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Karagahar P.S. Case No. 184 of 2010.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T