Kameshwar Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.150 of 2023 ====================================================== Kameshwar Prasad Singh Son of Late Shiv Shankar Singh Resident of Village-Harbanspur, Post Office-Bhalunidham, Police Staton-Dinara, DistrictRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Primary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna. 3.

The District Education Officer, District-Rohtas. 4.

The District Program Officer (Establishment), Rohtas, Sasaram 5.

Block Education Officer, Sasaram Block, District-Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Dhar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (Gp27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State.

2.

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to the authority concerned to make payment of the subsistence allowance for the period since 27.08.2019 to 15.06.2020 during which period the petitioner was suspended by the authority with statutory interest and for any other relief or reliefs for which, the petitioner is entitled. 3.

A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the State submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. In para-9 of the counter-affidavit,

Patna High Court CWJC No.150 of 2023(3) dt.28-03-2024 2/2 it is stated that after considering the representation filed by the petitioner, the subsistence allowance for suspension period since 27.08.2019 to 15.06.2020 came to Rs.2,80,017/- and the same has been sanctioned by the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Rohtas vide memo No.L-2391 dated 02.08.2023 and it was sent to the Treasury Officer, Rohtas for payment.

4.

Learned counsel for the State submits that out of the said amount Rs.30/- has been deducted towards Life Insurance, Rs.25,684/- has been deducted for contribution in PRAN and Rs.2000/- has been deducted for service tax. Thereafter, the rest amount to the tune of Rs.2,52,303/- has been paid to the petitioner.

5.

Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions, since the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, this writ application is hereby disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U