Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75888/2019rejected

Jadu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-06Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75888 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2019 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Jadu Ram S/o Late Jhapo Ram R/o village- Sarmera, P.S.- Sarmera, DistrictNalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indu Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 122 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 307, 324/34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of Sri Ashish Ranjan, J.M. Ist Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif. Submission is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity. The present case in counterblast of Complaint Case No. 1007 of 2019 (Annexure2). It is stated that parties are agnates and there is admitted land dispute between them. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75888 of 2019(2) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 direct allegation of giving spade blow and causing injury over the head of the informant. He also submitted that co-accused Debi Devi @ Babi Devi has been granted anticipatory bail considering the fact that she had not assaulted the informant and she is a lady hence, the case of petitioner is distinguished from the case of the lady accused.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) K.K.RAO/- U T