Saddam @ Sakib Anwar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76361 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Saddam @ Sakib Anwar S/o- Irshad Ansari @ Irshad Husin @ Irshad Hussain Vill- Lahan, Dhaka, P.S- Dhaka, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Zaki Haider, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(3), 324(4), 326(g), 109, 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2) and 61(2) of the BNS as well as Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case but then the said FIR also relates to the same occurrence for which the instant anticipatory bail application has been filed, as such, for the same occurrence, two FIRs have been instituted. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, namely, Faiyaz @ Md. Faiyaz had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No. 62139 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76361 of 2025(2) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 an order dated 29.08.2025. It is next submitted that while granting the privilege of anticipatory bail to Faiyaz @ Md. Faiyaz, this Court had considered the case on merit and in detail and the case of the petitioner is similar to the case of Faiyaz @ Md. Faiyaz, thus, based on parity seeks anticipatory bail.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the order dated 29.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62139 of 2025, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 303 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T