Sipu Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84727 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2024 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sipu Ram, Son of Saryu Ram @ Saraju Ram, Resident of village -Chauraisiya, PS-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sanjay Ram, Son of Late Shivparasan Ram, Resident of village -Chauraisiya, PS-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2025 Heard Mr Rajani Kant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Ahmad Ali, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No.418 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 96, 64 and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 4 of POCSO Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the daughter of the informant was missing. The informant alleged that the petitioner and one other have kidnapped his daughter.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84727 of 2024(4) dt.17-02-2025 2/2 case. During course of investigation, the victim was recovered and she has given her statetment under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated that she has solemnized marriage with the petitioner. She has not alleged anything against the petitioner. It is a case of affair outside the marriage. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 17.07.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Special Judge, POCSO Act-cum-A.D.J.-VI, Bhabhua, District-Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No.418 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T