Biplendra Yadav @ Koili Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62965 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2018 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Biplendra Yadav @ Koili Yadav, Son of Ram Kishore Yadav, Resident of Village Hanuman Nagar, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Shahnawaz Ali For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Baheri P.S. Case No. 124 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is of transporting 214 Litres of foreign liquor from BOLERO Car.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has committed no offence and has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.09.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62965 of 2018(2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 Judge-IV cum Special Judge (Excise), Darbhanga, in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 124 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U