Ravi @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.66469 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -299 Year- 2016 Thana -BEUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Ravi @ Ravi Kumar, Son of Radheshyam Mistri, Resident of Nasriganj, Police Station- Danapur, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beur P.S. Case No.299 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he has looted cash of Rs.1000/- from the informant with help of four unknown criminal who had come on two motorcycle.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his name has surfaced on confessional statement made by co-accused persons. Except said confession, there is no incriminating materials against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from his possession.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66469 of 2018 (2) dt.26-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge-cumA.C.J.M.-VIII, Patna in connection with Beur P.S. Case No.299 of 2016, with following conditions :-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Sanjeev/- U T