Subhan @ Abdus Subhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78863 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Purnia ====================================================== SUBHAN @ ABDUS SUBHAN SON OF LATE RAUF @ ABDUS RAUF RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KALAMBARI, CHAULHAR, P.S. - AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT - KATIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

ANGOORI KHATOON DAUGHTER OF MUSLIM PRADHAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KALAMBARI, CHAULHAR, P.S. - AZAMNAGAR, DISTRICT - KATIHAR. PRESENTLY RESIDENCE OF VILLAGE - MAHANANDAPARA, P.S. - PAREGRAM, DISTRICT - UTTAR DINAJPUR (WEST BENGAL) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Ejaz Akhter, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 504, 506, 498(A), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioner is said to have tortured the informant physically and mentally in association of his family members over the dowry demand. Thereafter, when the informant went to accused Abdul Ali's temporary address, petitioner called the police from Azamnagar Police Station and told them that his son Abdul Ali had divorced her and threatened her of dire consequences.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78863 of 2023(2) dt.12-12-2023 2/2 father-in-law of the informant. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that there is compromise between the parties. Petitioner has two criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is compromise between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 52 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T