Akhilesh Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68310 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2588 Year-2017 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Akhilesh Ram, Son of Moti Ram, Resident of Village- Piprakothi, Narauni, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nirmala Devi, Wife of Shankar Ram, Resident of Village- Sampur Barwa, Sangrampur, P.S.- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Complaint Case No. 2588 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act. Complainant is the wife of the petitioner who has alleged torture by the petitioner for non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that his antecedent is clean and the allegation made against him is false and concocted. Petitioner has stated that the informantcomplainant is not his wife and, as such, there is no question of demand of dowry or torture meted out to her.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68310 of 2018(2) dt.30-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Champaran at Motihari in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2588 of 2017 with following conditions:- (1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T