Suhaga Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80059 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2024 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Suhaga Devi, Wife of Ram Umesh Ram @ Umesh Ram @ Umesh Paswan, Resident of Village- Khaira, Harnath Tole, Dusadh Bigha, P.S- Risiyap, District- Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Sharan, Advocate Mr. Jayant Kumar Sharan, Advocate Mr. Hemant Kmar Sharan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Risiyap P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80(2) and 3(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

3. The case of the prosecution is that the daughter of the informant was married with one Indrajeet Paswan on 12.06.2023. On 18.07.2024, the informant received informantion on mobile that his daughter is seriously ill. When the informant along with his family members reached to the matrimonial house of his daughter, he found that she was lying

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80059 of 2024(3) dt.29-01-2025 2/2 dead on a cot.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased and she has been falsely implicated in this case. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. She has got no criminal antecedent. She is aged about 69 years and she is languishing in judicial custody since 19.07.2024.

5. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Risiyap P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T