Pritam Kumar @ Kaddua @ Kaddu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.68248 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2018 Thana- KIUL RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Pritam Kumar @ Kaddua @ Kaddu S/o - Krishna Prasad@ Krishan Mahto Resident of Village- Indaypar, P.S. Shekhpura, District- Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with GRP/Kiul P.S. Case No. 79 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a/26 of Arms Act.
Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol from the possession of petitioner. Petitioner is accused in one more case under Section 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is in custody since 14.04.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68248 of 2018(2) dt.28-11-2018 2/2 A.C.J.M.-cum-Railway Magistrate, Kiul (Lakhisarai), in connection with GRP/Kiul P.S. Case No. 79 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) veena/- U