Dablu Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 69457 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2018 Thana- Bikramganj District- Rohtas ====================================================== Dablu Khan son of Ahad Khan @ Abdul Ahad Khan, resident of Bikramganj, Police Station Bikramganj, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Syed Firoz Mr. Khatim Reza For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey Mr. Pratik Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.
30-11-2018 Heard Mr. Syed Firoz, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Khatim Reza, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Pratik Mishra, learned counsel, who has appeared on behalf of informant. The sole petitioner, who is in custody only since 07-09-2018 in Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 210 of 2018 registered for offence under Sections 341, 342, 323, 354, 379, 506, 307, 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though, it was alleged that in the occurrence, the petitioner fired on the informant, but it is not a case that any injury was caused on the person of the informant. It has also been argued that the so called rifle, which was said to be used by the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69457 of 2018(2) dt.30-11-2018 2/2 petitioner, was never recovered and as such, on aforesaid ground, he has made a prayer for grant of bail. Sri Mishra, learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer and submits that in the occurrence, firstly the accused persons including the petitioner snatched the eaxy lw= (mangalsutra) of the informant and thereafter, indiscriminate firing was made by the petitioner, but anyhow the informant could save her life. Learned counsel for the informant has also drawn my attention to statement made in paragraph - 3 of the petition to show that petitioner is habitual offender. Considering the nature of accusation as well as the fact that petitioner is accused in other cases also relating to serious offences, the prayer for bail stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T