Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Yadav @ Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75325 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2025 Thana- KHAJEKALA District- Patna ====================================================== Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Yadav @ Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Rai S/O Bijli Rai @ Bijli Yadav R/O Village- Diwan Mohalla Nauzar Ghat, P.S.- Khajekalan, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 45 of the Excise Act, 2022.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 31.05.2025 at about 7.00 P.M. he along with other police personnel proceeded for arresting an absconder Sanjay Rai and Ranjit Kumar against whom three FIR have been instituted and when they reached near the house of Sanjay Rai when Sanjay Rai along with two accused persons
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75325 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/3 fled from the place of occurrence and thereafter, 4-5 accused persons came and attacked the police personnel.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that allegation of assault is not specific and since petitioner resides near the house of absconding accused, as such, out of inquisitiveness he came at the place of occurrence and came to be implicated when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Khajekalan P. S. Case No.225 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75325 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T