Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76785 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2025 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Vijay Yadav @ Bijay Yadav R/o Village - Hira Tol, Ward No. 5, P.O. - Rahimpur, P.S. - Sahebpur Kamal, District - Begusarai.

2.

Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjit Yadav Son of Vijay Yadav @ Bijay Yadav R/o Village - Hira Tol, Ward No. 5, P.O. - Rahimpur, P.S. - Sahebpur Kamal, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(1), 351(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation in the first information report is that the petitioners assaulted the informant by means of rod causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on account of the fact that some dispute took place between the petitioners and the informant on account of parking of motorcycle. It has further been submitted that while the occurrence took place on 02.08.2025, the FIR got registered on 03.08.2025 and no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76785 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 explanation for the same has been tendered. Further, the injury report which is Annexure 2 to the present application also indicates that the injuries are in the nature of laceration, no bony injury having been caused and hence the opinion of the doctor is that the same are simple caused by hard and blunt object.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail of the petitioner on the grounds mentioned in the first information report.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the injuries are simple in nature coupled with the delay in the FIR, let the above named petitioners, who have no criminal antecedent, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T