Azamtullah @ Basar Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.68748 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2018 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Azamtullah @ Basar Khan Son of Late Ataur Khan, Resident of VillageRaghunathpur, P.O.-Peru, Police Station-Haspura, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anjum Perveen For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Haspura P.S. Case No. 147 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of torturing the informant due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry along with FIR named accused.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that petitioner never demanded dowry or subjected her to cruelty. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 27.07.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68748 of 2018(2) dt.30-11-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad or Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 147 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U