Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77511 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- Bariyarpur District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Rahul Kumar S/o- Navin Kumar Mishra R/v- Kharawna Ps- Sakra DistMuzaffarpur 2.

Raghuvar Pandey S/o- Late Ram Sagar Pandey R/v- Adhwara PsBariyarpur Dist- Muzaffarpur 3.

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kr. Pandey s/o- Raghuvar Pandey R/v- Adhwara Ps- Bariyarpur Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioners abused and assaulted the informant as a result of which, he sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to land dispute. Further submission is that the F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of five days without any plausible reason. The injury report dated 05.04.2025 of the injured shows simple injury. However, another injury report dated 31.08.2025 is showing grievous hurt without stating the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77511 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 injury on the accused. It appears that the injury report dated 31.08.2025 is manufactured and false. He next submits that petitioner no. 2 is aged about 69 years. Petitioner nos. 1 & 3 are son-in-law and son of petitioner no. 2 respectively. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Muzaffarpur (East) in connection with Bariyarpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T