Mukul Kumar Sahni @ Mukul Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76799 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2023 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Mukul Kumar Sahni @ Mukul Sahni S/o Suraj Narain Sahni @ Suraj Sahni @ Surya Narayan Singh R/o Village- Gujnai Basahi (Gunai Bashi), P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Khushi Awadh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 165/2023 dated 26.05.2023 registered for the offence punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants are alleged to have looted Rs. 2,32,540/- from Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Khalispur on the point of pistol. Further, they also took away DVR of C.C.T.V. camera.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76799 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 of the co-accused, Nishant Kumar Sahni. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46663/2025. The petitioner has ten criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 165/2023 with the condition:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T