Subhash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75370 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2025 Thana- SAMASTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Subhash Kumar S/o Manoj Kumar Resident of Ward no 13, Jitwarpur, Nizamat, P.S- Samastipur Muffasil, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Surya Narayan Roy For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. Case No.177/2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) of the B.N.S.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of four cases and the informant alleges that he was going home from Samastipur railway station when he was intercepted by four unknown accused on two motorcycles and they looted his trolley bag on point of gun, further he noted the number of the motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR was instituted against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of Ranjan in police
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75370 of 2025(2) dt.19-11-2025 2/2 custody, which does not have any evidentiary value.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has antecedent of four cases and in the event if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner may abscond or try to tamper with the evidence. It is next submitted that investigation of the case in its nascent stages.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T