Vikash Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72271 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Mandal, Son of Ram Kumar Mandal, Resident of VillageGaraukhar Hussainpur, P.S.- Rahika, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Smt. Rita Verma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is of misappropriation of Rs. 19,50,000/- by taking password from the informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is an unemployed student and he is preparing for competitive examination. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 27.09.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72271 of 2018(3) dt.20-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Benipatti, Madhubani, in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T