Dinesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83046 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-553 Year-2022 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Dinesh Yadav Son of Yogendra Yadav Resident of Village - Ratanpur, Police Station - Mirchaiya, District - Sirha, (Nepal) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kanchan Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 253 of 2023 arising out of Shashtri Nagar P.S. Case No. 553 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 489(A), 489(B), 489(C), 420, 417, 120(B), 418 & 419 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier vide orders dated 20-07-2024 & 14-05-2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14542 of 2023 & Cr. Misc. No. 14998 of 2024, prayer for bail of the petitioner is twice rejected. The present one is the third attempt for prayer of bail.

3.

A report from the trial court was called for and it is reported that two witnesses are only remained to be examined

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83046 of 2024(3) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 and trial is likely to be concluded within a period of two months.

4.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not find any fresh ground for reconsideration of the matter, which is already decided on merit by this Court. This Court would take note of the fact that petitioner is in custody since 01-09-2022.

5.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, specifically keeping in view the report of the trial court, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner as the trial is on the verge of its conclusion. Prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected.

6.

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible without any undue delay and unnecessary adjournments.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T