← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./74261/2018bail granted

Dilip Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-14Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.74261 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2018 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna ====================================================== Dilip Paswan, Son of Karu Paswan, Resident of Village- Didarganj Check Post, P.S. Malsalami, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Malsalami P.S. Case No. 334 of 2018 (Spl. Case No. 9042 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) and 37(b) (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 24 litres of country made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 28.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74261 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Court of Excise, Additional Sessions Judge-IInd, Patna, in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 334 of 2018(Spl. Case No. 9042 of 2018), with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U