← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79455/2025allowed

Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra Shah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-05Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79455 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Dharmendra Sah @ Dharmendra Shah Son of Dhaneshwar Sah VillageAkorhi PS- Akorhi Gola District- Rohtas 2.

Pawan Sah @ Chhotu Kumar son of Dhaneshwar Sah Village- Akorhi PSAkorhi Gola District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant due to which he sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that petitioners are brothers-in-law of the informant. The informant, who is husband of the petitioners' sister, used to assault and torture his wife for dowry and to make pressure, the present case has been lodged against the petitioners. Learned counsel further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79455 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 submits that specific allegation of assault by knife is on the coaccused Ravi Kumar Sah. Allegations against the petitioners are general in nature. Petitioners were not present at the place of occurrence. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T