← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75146/2025bail granted

Pintu Sah @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-03Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75146 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2025 Thana- DARPA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Pintu Sah @ Pintu Kumar, S/o- Sheo Shankar Sah, R/v- Belahiya P.S.- Darpa, Dist- East Champaran 2.

Mandip Sah @ Mandip Kumar, S/o- Sheo Shankar Sah, R/v- Belahiya P.S.- Darpa, Dist- East Champaran 3.

Sandip Sah @ Sandip Kumar, S/o- Sheo Shankar Sah, R/v- Belahiya P.SDarpa, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025

1. Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Darpa P. S. Case No. 12 of 2025 dated 15.01.2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 105 and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. The main submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioners are that the deceased actually died after coming into contact with an electric wire that had fallen

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75146 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 in the field of the petitioners and that incident was purely accidental and not intentional. It is further submitted that the police did not send up the petitioners for the alleged offences and submitted the final form in their favour but the trial court has taken cognizance of the alleged offences without any material. It is also submitted that good relations have now been restored in between both the parties and they have compromised the matter and the petitioners have clean antecedent.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners.

5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the above stated facts, mainly the petitioners' above plea as to the death of the deceased having occurred due to an accident arising from her coming into contact with an electric wire on the field of the petitioners, in my opinion, it is a fit case for anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, let the petitioners named-above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Darpa P. S. Case No. 12 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75146 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U T