Tufani Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80265 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-573 Year-2025 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Tufani Ray, Son of Fudina Ray, Resident of Vill -Ram Sagar(Lala ka Tola), P.S. -Barhara District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Ojaswee Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Ms. Ojaswee Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 573 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317 and 111 of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police has information that certain miscreants are indulged in selling stolen bikes. It is further alleged that a bike was also recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 80265 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 case. The bike which has been seized from him is the bike of one Sonu Kumar who is cousin father-in-law and Sonu Kumar has given his statement that he has given this bike to this petitioner in marriage as gift. It has also been submitted that the bike which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is his own bike, it is not the stolen. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 18.07.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 573 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T