← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3626/2025dismissed

Shiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Land Reforms

2025-11-21Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3626 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12989 of 2025 ====================================================== Shiv Kumar Singh Son of Ramnagina Singh, Resident of Village-Tetua, Police Station-Atri, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms Government of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna, Sri Dipak Kumar Singh.

2.

The Additional Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Secretariat, Patna, Sri Dipak Kumar Singh. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya, Bihar, Sri A.N. Sakeda.

4.

The District Magistrate cum District Collector, Gaya, Bihar, Sri Prashant Shubhankar.

5.

The Additional Collector, Gaya, Bihar, Sri Ashutosh Kumar. 6.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Neemchak Bathani, Gaya, Sri Keshav Anand.

7.

The Circle Officer, Atri Block, District-Gaya, Bihar, Sri Dilip Kumar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ojha, GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the contemnors / opposite parties for willful and deliberate violation of the order dated 18.08.2025 passed in CWJC No. 12989 of 2025 by this Court.

3. At the outset, Mr. Ojha, learned GA-7 submits that

Patna High Court MJC No.3626 of 2025(2) dt.21-11-2025 2/2 the order dated 18.08.2025 gave till 31.12.2025 to the respondents to file final order and we are in the month of November 2025.

4. The petition is ill-advised, improper and is accordingly dismissed.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U