← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./79007/2025rejected

Rambachchan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-06Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79007 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2025 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rambachchan Sharma, aged about-30 years, Son of Shankar Mistri @ Shankar Sharma Resident Of Village- Sarsa, Ps- Lachhuara, Dist- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

XYZ wife of Santu Ram Resident Of Village- Sarmera, Ps- Sarmera, DistNalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hansraj, Advocate Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is accused in a case registered for the offense punishable under sections 87 of the BNS and Section 8/12 of the POCSO Act in connection with POCSO Case No.12 of 2025.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, who is a married man, is alleged to have abducted the minor daughter, of the informant with an intention to marry her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that petitioner has got no criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79007 of 2025(7) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition and he is in custody since 25.01.2025.

5. Earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 02.07.2025 passed in Cr. Miscellaneous No.16756 of 2025 and there is no fresh ground to reconsider the prayer of bail of this petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the bail application of this petitioner is again rejected.

7. The learned Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as soon as possible within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T